Legalnaut
Start a case review

FEATURES

Everything the file holds, anchored to the page it came from.

Advanced language models read every page once: OCR, transcription, dates, people, claims, and the comparison of every claim against the rest of the file. The reading a paralegal would bill for happens in the background, so the hours go on judgement rather than on looking things up.

READ THE FILE ONCE

Every page goes in once. Scans, mail and recordings too.

An archive, a folder or a forwarded mailbox travels one road. What arrives as an image is read by OCR, what arrives as a recording is transcribed, and nothing is analysed twice.

Archives and mailboxes, not one file at a time
Drop in a ZIP of the whole file, or forward mail to the address the workspace gives you. Formats are recognised by content, so a badly named file still lands where it belongs, and an attachment is filed as a document of its own.
OCR on every page, with no ceiling
A scanned bundle is read to its last page. Where the text comes out below 70% confidence the document says so, and you know which pages to check against the original.
Chat screenshots read as conversations
A WhatsApp or Messenger screenshot becomes a transcript of who wrote what and when, shown as a thread rather than as a wall of OCR.
Recordings become searchable text
Hearings and voice messages are transcribed in the background. A minute of audio counts as one page, and the transcript costs nothing more.
Duplicates never cost a page
Every file is fingerprinted with sha256 before anything runs. A file already in the case is recognised and skipped, whatever it is called.
Authenticity checks on e-mail and photographs
An e-mail is checked against its DKIM signature and its received chain, a photograph against its EXIF data. Each check reports verified, failed or unavailable, and unavailable is shown as exactly that.
The cost before the import
The import screen counts the pages before it starts, so you see what a folder will take from the monthly pool before you commit it.
The import log: filed, already in the records, waiting for pages.
A document opened on the cited page, with the passage highlighted and its provenance beside it.

KNOW WHAT HAPPENED

The chronology the documents wrote, not the one you remember

Dates, people and events come out of every document and onto one timeline. Each entry keeps the document, the page and the sentence it came from.

Many events from one document
A forty-page pleading that describes twelve dated events puts twelve points on the timeline, each with its quotation.
Your reading, kept with the record
Mark an entry key, relevant or background; disputed or not; favourable, adverse or neutral. Those marks are yours, never a model's, and they drive the exports.
Gaps in the material
The chronology export prints every stretch of ninety days or more with no dated item, so a silence in the file is visible before the other side points it out.
Who said what about whom
A profile for every person and organisation: their statements, what others said about them, the documents they wrote, the events they took part in. Two spellings of one name merge as an overlay, and the source index stays as it was.
Correspondence, measured
Who wrote to whom, how often, how long a reply took, and every silence of thirty days or more. Counted from the headers, not interpreted.
What relies on what
When a letter refers to an earlier document, the two are linked. The document page shows what it relies on and what relies on it, which is how a missing attachment gets noticed.
Quotations in the original language
Summaries and titles are written in your working language. A quotation is never translated, because a translated quotation stops being a quotation.
The timeline, narrowed to one person and one quarter.
A person's profile: what they said, what was said about them, the documents they wrote.
Correspondence by pair and by month, with the silences marked.

FIND WHERE THE ACCOUNTS DISAGREE

Every claim, checked against the rest of the file

Statements are broken into claims, and each claim is compared with the whole file in both directions. Where two documents disagree, both are shown with their quotations.

Two quotations, side by side
A contradiction is two quotations side by side, each with its document and page, and a sentence on why they conflict. Confirmations and context are kept as well, because a claim with independent support is evidence in your favour.
The software suggests, a lawyer confirms
Each pair is a suggestion until you confirm or dismiss it. A dismissed pair never comes back, and only a confirmed one reaches a draft, a report or a chat answer as a fact.
A party cannot corroborate itself
A later letter from the same author does not count as confirmation of their earlier claim. Those pairs are marked and kept out of the lists.
You can see how far the check went
The document page shows how many candidate pairs were examined and offers to examine more. A pair already judged is never sent to a model again.
Near-duplicates flagged, not merged
A later version of the same letter, or the same letter filed twice, is badged on the document and left for you to decide.
The case against you, in writing
Devil's advocate writes the strongest opposing argument from your own matter: the weakest exhibits, the confirmed contradictions that hurt, the documents the other side will ask for.
The contradictions list: suggested, confirmed and dismissed, with the counter-evidence beside each claim.

PROVE IT

From issue to exhibit to gap, on one chart

A proof chart puts each issue you have to establish next to the facts and exhibits that carry it, and shows where nothing does yet. Everything drafted from it is checked against the file before you see it.

The proof chart
Define the issues and who bears the burden. Attach a document as supporting or undermining. An issue with nothing behind it is marked as a gap. Suggestions come from your own documents, and nothing attaches without a click.
An evidentiary motion from the chart
Each exhibit with the fact it is offered to prove, in the form the court expects. Each gap becomes a request for production.
A citation check on every AI text
Every draft and every chat answer is checked against the records: the document exists and you may see it, the page exists, a quotation of four words or more appears in a document cited in the same paragraph, a case number is one the file knows. Anything else is reported, never quietly repaired.
Pin-cites to the page
A claim, a contradiction or a chat answer cites the page. One click opens the document on that page with the passage highlighted.
Exhibit numbers that stay put
A matter numbers its exhibits once, with your prefix, and every export uses those numbers.
Bundles with an integrity annex
The evidence bundle is one PDF: an index, every exhibit converted and merged, a bookmark per exhibit, and an annex listing each file's sha256 and authenticity result.
Chronology, statement of facts, case report
The working chronology as DOCX, a statement of facts written from your key and relevant entries with pin-cites, a case report as PDF. Built from the records without a model, so they cost no pages.
A redacted copy for a third party
A pseudonym registry per matter turns names into roles in every export, so a bundle can go to an expert or a mediator without the identities. The records underneath are unchanged.
The proof chart: issues, the exhibits that support or undermine each one, and the gaps.
A generated draft with its citation check: every cite resolved against the records.
The integrity annex at the end of an evidence bundle, one sha256 per exhibit.

PREPARE THE HEARING

Walk in knowing the witness and the deadline

Everything the file holds about one person, gathered for the examination, and every procedural time limit computed from the provision and the date of service.

The witness dossier
For one person: their statements, what was said about them, the documents they wrote, the events they took part in, and the statements the records contradict. Every line with document, page and quotation, assembled without a model.
An examination outline from the dossier alone
Background to lock in, facts that help, facts that hurt, an impeachment sequence for each inconsistency, and the questions the file cannot answer. Every question points at a line in the dossier, and an unverified inconsistency is listed as a risk.
Reminders and a calendar feed
Each deadline sends a reminder in the recipient's language at the workspace's own hour, and the whole list exports as a calendar feed.
A matter briefing on demand
Posture, what changed, next steps, gaps and risks, written from the matter's own material and marked as a working draft.
A witness dossier: statements, what was said about them, and the inconsistencies, each with its cite.
A deadline with the provision it comes from and the arithmetic written out.

KEEP THE CLIENT INFORMED

The client reads the same file, in plain language

The people paying for the case can see where it stands without a phone call: an update written for them, a viewer role that cannot change anything, and a log of who looked at what.

An update in plain language
One click drafts a status update for the client from the matter's material: what happened, what is next, what is waiting on them. Factual, not predictive, and marked as a draft for you to send.
A seat for the client, at no cost
Add the client as a viewer. They read and export, and cannot edit or delete. Sensitive material stays out of their view.
Every look is logged
Views, downloads, exports and deletions are written to an audit log that the people it records cannot edit.
Nine interface languages
The interface runs in English, Polish, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch and Ukrainian, so a client abroad works the same file. The evidence stays in its original language.
An update for the client, drafted from the matter in plain language.
The team screen: administrator, lawyer, specialist and viewer, with what each can do.

ASK THE FILE

Ask a question. It searches, reads and cites before it answers.

The assistant does not answer from a summary. It has tools on the records, uses them in front of you, and every sentence it writes names the document and the page it came from.

Four ways to search
Full-text over the documents, with filters for type, category, jurisdiction and date. Search by meaning, so a paraphrase in another language still finds the document. Search in the extracted text of attachments, scans and recordings. Search in the documents the team added after the file arrived.
It reads the whole document, not a snippet
A long document is read to the last page, window by window. A mail thread is read in order, message by message. An attachment is opened in full, whether its text came from OCR or from a transcript.
It knows the shape of the file
Events on the timeline by date, actor or jurisdiction. Claims by speaker and by kind: accusation, admission, denial, threat, promise. A profile of any person by name or alias. Contradictions, each with a note on whether a lawyer has confirmed it. The documents tagged with a given provision, marked as a hypothesis for a lawyer to check. The counts for the whole case.
A count comes from the database, not from memory
When a question needs a number, the assistant runs one read-only query on the case tables. A document the team has hidden, or one the user may not see, is absent from every table the query can reach.
Answers that name their sources
Every document it relies on appears as a citation with the page, and the citation is a link that opens the document on that page. The line under the message says how many of the citations were verified against the file.
Ten questions to start from
Summarise the case. What did a person say about a topic. Who is this name. What happened in a period. A chronology of a topic, the contradictions about it, the evidence for an assertion, the correspondence with a person, a document in full, a search of the attachments. A short form fills in the name or the period, and the question lands in the box for you to sharpen before it is sent.
It files and takes notes on request
It can add a document, claim, event or contradiction to a matter with a note on why it matters, and leave a note for the team on any of them. A note it writes is marked as the assistant's and is visible to everyone on the file. Those are the only two things it can write.
The rules it answers under
It answers in the language of the file unless you ask for another. It calls the parties by their neutral procedural designations. A legal qualification is marked as needing a lawyer.
A chat answer with its citations, and the citation check under the message.
While the answer streams, each tool the assistant reaches for shows up as a pill: search, read, timeline, contradictions.
Ten starting questions. A short form fills in the person, topic or period and puts the question in the box for you to sharpen.

Where we do it differently

Most software in this market is priced and built in ways lawyers put up with rather than choose. The left column is what you are used to. The right column is how this works.

WHAT YOU ARE USED TO HERE
A price for every seat, so the team shares one login Unlimited users on every plan. Add the client, the paralegal and the expert.
Storage billed by the gigabyte Storage is not metered. Keep the scans and the recordings in the file.
Credits, tokens or a monthly AI allowance to run out of One unit: a page of analysis, counted once when a file enters the case. Chat, search, exports, drafts and dossiers are not on the meter.
A price on a quote, after a sales call Published prices, a 14-day trial with no card, and a card only when you decide to pay.
A surcharge for OCR and transcription A scanned page and a minute of recording cost the same page as a typed one.
AI output that rewrites the record The text, the path and the checksum of a document are fixed on arrival. What a model writes lives in separate columns and can be regenerated without touching the evidence.
AI findings presented as facts A finding is a suggestion until a lawyer confirms it, and every AI text is checked against the file before you see it.
Files deleted on a retention schedule Nothing is deleted on a schedule. If a plan lapses the workspace turns read-only, and reading, searching and exporting stay open.
An import refused when the quota is hit A file the pool cannot cover waits, stored and unbilled, and starts on its own when pages arrive. Running out mid-case costs one pack of 5,000 pages, on any plan.

The plans, the page pool and the pack are on the pricing page. Every plan carries every feature on this page.

What it will not do

  • It does not give legal advice, and it does not decide what a document means. That stays with the lawyer.
  • It does not file anything with a court.
  • It is not an e-discovery platform. There is no privilege review and no review batching.
  • An AI finding is a suggestion until a lawyer confirms it, and every generated document opens with the words "working draft".
  • Statutory holidays are not applied to deadlines. The provision and the arithmetic are shown, so a holiday end is yours to correct.

That is the boundary that keeps every answer checkable.

Try it on the file you are working now.

One case file, 14 days, no card. Every feature on this page is in the trial.

See the plans